Wed Jun 20, 2012 at 12:05 PM PDT
On Tuesday, the National Security Archive released a trove of 120 previously secret documents concerning the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States. With revelations about the CIA’s budget concerns in 2000 and the unheeded warnings in 2001, the picture they paint isn’t a pretty one for either Bill Clinton or George W. Bush. But for President Bush, the papers constitute an especially damning indictment. After all, the 9/11 documents clearly belie Bush White House claims that nobody “no one could have anticipated that kind of attack.” And as it turns out, from 9/11 and the chaos in Iraq to Hurricane Katrina, the recession which began in late 2007 and so much more, George W. Bush was the “Nobody Could Have Predicted” President.
As NSA’s Barbara Elias-Sanborn concluded, “I don’t think the Bush administration would want to see these released.” Salon’s Jordan Michael Smith explained why:
Many of the documents publicize for the first time what was first made clear in the 9/11 Commission: The White House received a truly remarkable amount of warnings that al-Qaida was trying to attack the United States. From June to September 2001, a full seven CIA Senior Intelligence Briefs detailed that attacks were imminent, an incredible amount of information from one intelligence agency. One from June called “Bin-Ladin and Associates Making Near-Term Threats” writes that “[redacted] expects Usama Bin Laden to launch multiple attacks over the coming days.” The famous August brief called “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike the US” is included. “Al-Qai’da members, including some US citizens, have resided in or travelled to the US for years, and the group apparently maintains a support structure here,” it says.
During the entire month of August, President Bush was on vacation at his ranch in Texas — which tied with one of Richard Nixon’s as the longest vacation ever taken by a president. CIA Director George Tenet has said he didn’t speak to Bush once that month, describing the president as being “on leave.” Bush did not hold a Principals’ meeting on terrorism until September 4, 2001, having downgraded the meetings to a deputies’ meeting, which then-counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke has repeatedly said slowed down anti-Bin Laden efforts “enormously, by months.”
That’s a far cry from the statements of Team Bush, which for years has defended itself from charges it was asleep at the wheel by insisting “nobody could have predicted” the Al Qaeda attacks of September 11, 2001.As George W. Bush was taking office in early 2001, the Hart-Rudman Commission on U.S. National Security issued its report declaring “The combination of unconventional weapons proliferation with the persistence of international terrorism will end the relative invulnerability of the U.S. homeland to catastrophic attack” and cautioning “many thousands of American lives” are at risk. At a transition briefing in the White House situation room during the first week of January, Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy Berger warned his successor Condoleezza Rice, “I believe that the Bush Administration will spend more time on terrorism generally, and on al-Qaeda specifically, than any other subject.” And on January 25, 2001, counterrorism czar Richard Clarke (who helped lead the 1996 effort to protect the Atlanta Olympics from, among other things, threats from hijacked aircraft) handed the Bush national security team the famous Delenda plan for attacking Al Qaeda.
But in the aftermath of the horrific 9/11 attacks, Condi Rice played the role of a reverse Nostradmus, detailing the myriad foreign policy and security disasters she failed to predict. Confronted by 9/11 commissioner Richard Ben Veniste about the August 6, 2001 PDB (Presidential Daily Brief) which warned of “patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks,” national security adviser Rice responded:
“I believe the title was ‘Bin Laden determined to strike in U.S.'”
For his part, the vacationing President George W. Bush responded to the CIA presenter of the infamous August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) which warned of Al Qaeda’s intent to attack the U.S. homeland by declaring:
“All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.”
On March 22, 2004, Rice took to the op-ed pages of the Washington Post to argue, “No al-Qaeda threat was turned over to the new administration.” And in an argument she would later make repeatedly, Rice first introduced the now ubiquitous “nobody could have predicted” defense on May 16, 2002:
“I don’t think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon; that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile. All of this reporting about hijacking was about traditional hijacking.”
In early 2008, White House spokesman Tony Fratto showed that Rice’s talking point still had legs. Spoon-fed last month by Fox News anchor Jon Scott’s suggestion that “nobody was thinking that there’d be terrorists flying 767s into buildings at that point,” Fratto reliably coughed up the laughably discredited sound bite:
“That’s true. I mean, no one could have anticipated that kind of attack – or very few people.”
“No, obviously, I wouldn’t have predicted that. On the other hand I wouldn’t have predicted 9/11, the global war on terror, the need to simultaneous run military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq or the near collapse of the financial system on a global basis, not just the U.S.”
So it was with the Iraq war.The chaos that followed the U.S. invasion – the looting and the breakdown of security, the impact of disbanding the Iraqi army, the explosion of sectarian conflict, the prospects for a Sunni insurgency – was presciently predicted by the CIA and State Department long before the war began.
But for President Bush, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and others in the administration, these disastrous setbacks for the American people were the unfortunate – and unknowable – results of a smashing victory for the United States. As the looting and ransacking of Baghdad spun out of control in April 2003, Rumfeld portrayed the administration’s utter lack of foresight as a positive development:
“Think what’s happened in our cities when we’ve had riots, and problems, and looting. Stuff happens!…Freedom’s untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things. They’re also free to live their lives and do wonderful things, and that’s what’s going to happen here.”
A year later as the insurgency was taking a terrible toll of U.S. forces in Iraq, President Bush on August 30, 2004 offered the purest articulation of the uniquely Republican theory that nothing succeeds like failure (especially unanticipated failure):
“Had we had to do it [the invasion of Iraq] over again, we would look at the consequences of catastrophic success – being so successful so fast that an enemy that should have surrendered or been done in escaped and lived to fight another day.”
As it turned out, the President’s “catastrophic success” extended to his Bush Doctrine of expanding freedom and democracy throughout the Middle East. Sadly, when voters in the Palestinian territories went to the polls in January 2006, they much to surprise of Team Bush overwhelmingly chose Hamas.That result (one coincidentally not reflected in the State Department’s official timeline of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process) came as a complete shock to Secretary of State Rice, if few others. As the New York Times reported:
“I’ve asked why nobody saw it coming,” Ms. Rice said, speaking of her own staff. “It does say something about us not having a good enough pulse.”
(Making matters worse, Vanity Fair and others detailed how subsequent covert U.S. backing of armed Fatah units helped spark the bloody civil war that left Hamas in control of Gaza.)Of course, the Bush administration’s refusal to acknowledge that which multitudes had foreseen extends to domestic policy as well. Nowhere is that more true than the devastation wrought on New Orleans and the Gulf Coast by Hurricane Katrina.
FEMA and other federal agencies had long fretted about the danger of a major tropical storm inundating New Orleans, as a 2001 study made clear. As Hurricane Katrina approach the city, Dr. Max Mayfield of the National Hurricane Center briefed President Bush, DHS Secretary Chertoff and FEMA’s Brown on Sunday, August 28th, noting later, “It’s not like this was a surprise. We had in the advisories that the levee could be topped.” That afternoon, the National Weather Service warned, “Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks, perhaps longer,” adding, “Water shortages will make human suffering incredible by modern standards.”
And yet, George W. Bush insisted in the days after the catastrophe, no one could have foreseen the death of New Orleans. As the Washington Post put it:
President Bush, in a televised interview three days after Katrina hit, suggested that the scale of the flooding in New Orleans was unexpected. “I don’t think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees. They did anticipate a serious storm,” Bush said in a Sept. 1 interview on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”
Which brings us to Vice President Cheney’s pathetic claim two years ago about the economic crisis that there wasn’t “anybody saw it coming.” There was, of course, a legion of analysts, journalists and even members of the Bush administration warning about mortgage-backed securities and the collapse of the housing market. But as ThinkProgress documented, White House officials throughout 2008 denied the recession already underway since the previous December. Again, it was the hapless Tony Fratto who offered up the signature Bush sound bite on January 8, 2008:
“I don’t know of anyone predicting a recession.”
Of course, what everyone could have predicted is that Team Bush would claim credit for the killing of Osama Bin Laden two years after they left office. Ex-chief of staff Andy Card, who famously dressed up George W. Bush in a flight suit to announce “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq nine years ago, protested that President Obama “has pounded his chest a little too much.” While Dick Cheney suggested that the Bush regime of detainee torture uncovered Bin Laden, Donald Rumsfeld credited “the relentless, sustained pressure on al Qaeda that the Bush administration initiated after 9/11 and that the Obama administration has wisely chosen to continue.” Meanwhile, Condoleezza Rice praised the man she once called her husband for “having taken the really tough decisions that put the infrastructure in place to do this.”Regardless, what President Bush couldn’t do, despite all of the evidence available to help him, was predict the devastating Al Qaeda attacks of September 11, 2001 – or just about anything else.
“Nobody knows who is really behind anything.” – “Superior General of the Vatican, the Black Pope in this must see video:
9/11 SOLVED: Please honor the fallen victims of this horrible mass murder by exposing the truth.